Legal Opinion

Jewel Tea Co. v. Watkins

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1915No. 4120PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. Hon. John H. Denison, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, P. J.,

rendered the opinoin of the court.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into' a contract whereby the latter became an employe of the former as a salesman. The plaintiff corporation was engaged in selling teas, coffees, and other culinary articles, from wagons driven by its employes over well established trade routes in this state. ' The sole question presented for our consideration is as to the validity of a certain paragraph in the written contract entered into by the parties, which reads as follows:

“Party of the second part (defendant in error and defendant below) further agrees…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Taylor CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway v. Denver and Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Freudenthal v. EspeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  5. McKeesport Machine Co. v. Ben Franklin InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Whittenberg v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  2. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  3. Ryska v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Superior Oil Co. v. Western Slope Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. MR Mansfield Realty, Inc. v. SunshineColorado Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API