Shinkle v. Meek
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Hamilton district court; William Easton Hutchison, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*369The opinion of the court was delivered by
Cunningham, J. :
The meritorious question here involved is whether, in the final notice of redemption, the inclusion of a printer’s fee of twenty-five cents and a county treasurer’s fee of five cents in the amount necessary to redeem lands sold for taxes is sufficient to avoid a deed issued in pursuance of such sale, if attacked before the running of the statute of limitations in its favor.
The statute relating to this final notice (Gen. Stat. 1901, § 7671) provides that it shall contain “ a list of all unredeemed lands and town lots, describing each…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Douglass v. NuzumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Watkins v. IngeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Babbitt v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Casner v. GahlmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
3Cited by8 opinions
- Teal Lake Iron Mining Co. v. OldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Utah Copper Co. v. Stephen Hayes Estate, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1934
- Salter v. CorbettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Clark v. TandySupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Harp v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.