Legal Opinion
Shum v. Intel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 22, 2010No. 2009-1385, 2009-1419PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PROST. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
PROST, Circuit Judge.
In part, this case is about inventorship. Mostly, however, this case is about various claims arising under California law. While the theories as to each state law claim differ slightly, all are essentially grounded in fraud. The ones at issue on appeal include breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent concealment, unjust enrichment, breach of contract, and intentional misrepresentation. This appeal also challenges the district court’s findings regarding the inventorship of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Thompson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Mylan Institutional LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Copart, Inc. v. Sparta Consulting, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Xpertuniverse Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.