Legal Opinion

Truppa v. Prudential Property & Casualty Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 15, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MENZA, J.S.C.

Does the personal injury protection (PIP) provision of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act permit payments to a passenger covered by a liability policy who sustains injuries while a passenger in a commercial vehicle which is involved in an accident with a private automobile? The answer is that it does not.

There are no New Jersey cases which have addressed this issue. The facts are as follows, Plaintiff suffered injuries when a taxicab in which she was a passenger was involved in an automobile accident with a private passenger automobile. She made a claim for PIP…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Amiano v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Hoglin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beaugard v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  2. Ingersoll v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance v. HardyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API