Legal Opinion · Dissent

New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance v. Hardy

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 17, 2003Published

1Dissent

LISA, J.A.D.,

dissenting.

In my view, the 1999 Ford Crown Victoria owned and used by the City of Newark as a marked police car is an “automobile” within the meaning of N.J.S.A 39:6A-2a. Because Kason Cheeks was injured while occupying that vehicle, he is entitled to pursue collection of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits from New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company (NJM) under its policy issued to Cheeks’ father, with whom Cheeks resided at the time of the accident. N.J.SA 39:6A-4. Therefore, I dissent.

PIP benefits are payable to covered individuals “who sustain bodily injury as a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Amiano v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Christy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Rybeck v. RybeckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Rybeck v. RybeckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Wagner v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API