Legal Opinion

Ingersoll v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 15, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KEEFE, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Brian Lihou appeals from the entry of summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (Aetna), denying plaintiffs claim that he was entitled to extended medical benefits under the Aetna policy. We affirm.1

On October 26, 1987 plaintiff was operating his brother William’s motorcycle when it was struck in the rear by an automobile operated by Lisa Hamilton. As a result of the accident, plaintiff incurred medical bills in excess of $35,000.

At the time of the accident, plaintiff owned an automobile…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Medical Society v. New Jersey Department of Law & Public SafetySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. ISKOS. v. Planning Bd. of Tp. of LivingstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  3. Hoglin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Truppa v. Prudential Property & Casualty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BullNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  2. Ingersoll v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API