Legal Opinion

Roberson v. Roberson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1979No. 789DC281PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

It is a well-established principle of trial practice that control over the arguments of counsel is largely within the discretion of the presiding judge. See Rupert v. Rupert, 15 N.C. App. 730, 190 S.E. 2d 693 (1972), cert. denied, 282 N.C. 153, 191 S.E. 2d 759 (1972). Indeed, the power of the trial judge is to maintain absolute control of his courtroom is essential to the maintenance of proper decorum and the effective administration of justice. “It may still be said that the judge holds his court as a driver holds the reins (Webster), to govern, guide restrain, except…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mauney v. MauneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  3. Cox v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Dam v. BondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Gorrell v. GorrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whedon v. WhedonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Shore v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Shore v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API