Legal Opinion

Dam v. Bond

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1926No. Docket No. 3166PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The complaint sets forth, in substance, that on or about the twenty-fourth day of January, 1922, the plaintiff was driving an automobile, to wit, a Dodge Brothers’ commercial car, in a southerly direction along a public highway in the county of Tuba, that while plaintiff was then and there proceeding along by the side of several horse-drawn vehicles traveling in an opposite direction to plaintiff and while plaintiff was keeping on the westerly half of said highway, the defendant’s car, driven by one J. W. Benner as the defendant’s agent, was proceeding in an opposite direction to plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graybiel v. AugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Center v. KeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Havens v. LoebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Rieger v. RichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Larson v. Blue & White Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Gillette v. GilletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Musante v. GuerriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API