Legal Opinion

Wright v. Mathews

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1903No. 1,604PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fergus County; Dudley Du Bose, Judge. ActioN by Frank E. Wright and others against Royal B. Mathews. From a judgment in favor of .defendant, and an order denying their motion for a new trial, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Itotloway

This was an adverse suit instituted in the district court of Fergus county, Montana, pursuant to Section 2326 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (U. S. Comp-. St.. 1901, p. *4431430), to determine the relative rights of the parties to certain mineral lands covered by conflicting claims. Upon the pleadings issues were joined, and the cause tried to the court and a jury. At the close of plaintiffs’ case, upon motion of the defendant, the court granted a nonsuit, and entered a judgment in favor of the defendant for costs, from which judgment and an order denying their motion for a new…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ogle v. PotterMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Beach v. Spokane Ranch & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Power v. LenoirMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Sweeney v. Great Falls & Canada Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Burns v. NaptonMontana Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Bank v. SchultzeMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Canning v. FriedMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Vreeland v. EdensMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Fournier v. CoudertMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Sell v. SellMontana Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API