Sell v. Sell
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Fergus County; Jack Briscoe, Judge. Action for divorce by Hattie Sell against Herman Sell. From orders refusing to set aside plaintiff’s default and denying her motion for new trial, and from a judgment rendered for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway
This action for divorce was instituted by Hattie Sell in January, 1913. Issues were joined and the cause was tried during the same year, resulting in a decree in favor of the plaintiff; but thereafter, by stipulation of, the parties, the decree was set aside and a new trial granted. On November 14, 1918, the cause was set for trial for November 29, at 10 o’clock A. M., but, when that hour arrived, the plaintiff was not personally present in court, and a continuance was granted until 2 o’clock P. M., at which time, the plaintiff having failed to appear personally, the court ordered her default…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stephens v. ConleyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Rumping v. RumpingMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Canning v. FriedMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Wright v. MathewsMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Keator v. GlaspieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Russell v. Sunburst Refining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928
- Munger v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- McVey v. JemisonMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Currie v. LangstonMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Aronow v. BishopMontana Supreme Court · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.