Legal Opinion
Speaks v. Hoage
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 6, 1935No. 6389PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
This is a case arising under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (44 Stat. 1424 ; 33 USCA §§ 901-950 [made applicable to the District of Columbia 45 Stat. 600; D. C. Code (1929) tit. 19, c. 2, §§ 11, 12]).
The deputy commissioner rejected the claim for compensation in the case. Appellant, as plaintiff, then brought suit in the lower court to set aside the deputy commissioner’s ruling. The lower court denied the plaintiff’s prayer, whereupon this appeal was taken.
It appears from the record that on January 17, 1934, Ilarvey Speaks was an employee of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Hoage v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Queensboro Farm Products, Inc. v. WickardDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
- Grain Handling Co. v. McManigalDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1938
- M. H. Renken Dairy Co. v. WickardDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
- Trudenich v. MarshallDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.