Legal Opinion
M. H. Renken Dairy Co. v. Wickard
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 18, 1942No. 2246PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendant under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
This action is brought to review the ruling made by the Secretary of Agriculture upon a petition filed by the plaintiff pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, § 8c (15) (A), 7 U.S.C.A. § 608c (15) (A).
The complaint herein is filed pursuant to Section 8c (15) (B) of the said Act, and is for the purpose of reviewing the following ruling made, by the Commissioner upon the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Wheeling Corrugating Co. v. McManigalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Queensboro Farms Products, Inc. v. WickardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Queensboro Farms Products v. WickardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Bailey Farm Dairy Co. v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945
- Beatrice Creamery Co. v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1947
- Grandview Dairy, Inc. v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.