Legal Opinion
Queensboro Farm Products, Inc. v. Wickard
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 19, 1942No. 2556PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ABRUZZO, District Judge.
This is a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendant under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Simultaneously therewith, the plaintiff filed a cross-motion for summary judgment in its favor.
This action arises out of a ruling by the Secretary of Agriculture upon a petition filed by the plaintiff pursuant to Section 8c(15) (A) of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C.A. § 608c (15) (A). The plaintiff, dissatisfied with the ruling in question, filed the complaint herein for the purpose of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Speaks v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
- New York State Guernsey Breeders Co-op., Inc. v. WallaceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Queensboro Farms Products, Inc. v. WickardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Queensboro Farms Products v. WickardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Bailey Farm Dairy Co. v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945
- Beatrice Creamery Co. v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.