Legal Opinion

United States v. Jaramillo

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 21, 1951No. 4203_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Like United States v. Cox (United States v. Beasley), 10 Cir., 190 F.2d 293, this appeal involves the correct measure of just compensation for the taking for war purposes ranching lands in the State of New Mexico. The appellee, Manuel Jaramillo, was the owner of 33 acres of land in Bernalillo County, New Mexico. He was the lessee of 90 acres from the State of New Mexico, and held a grazing permit for 48 head of cattle on about 25 sections of public domain in the Cibola National Forest, Which adjoined or touched the state land on the east.

By appropriate condemnation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. McCandless v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State Highway Commission v. FortuneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Diamond Ring Ranch, Inc. v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Helen Louise Corbin, Virginia May Wyllie, Appellants-LandownersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API