Legal Opinion

McCandless v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1936No. 552PublishedCited by 199 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

Court.

This is a suit brought in the United States District Court for the Territory of Hawaii by the government against petitioners to condemn 4,080 acres of land on the Island of Oahu for a federal public purpose. The territorial law provides that in such a suit the value of the land and the value of the improvements thereon must be separately assessed. A common-law jury was empaneled, heard the case, and returned a verdict for petitioners fixing the value of the land at $206,503.51, and the value of the improvements thereon at $14,000. Judgment was entered in accordance with the verdict. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Williams v. Great Southern Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Palmer v. McCaffertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by199 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Irving v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Romero v. Drummond Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API