Legal Opinion
Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 18, 2002No. B151027PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J.
In this declaratory relief action, we conclude that the procedure for administrative challenge to a punitive reduction in pay grade or deselection from a bonus position for an employee of the Los Angeles Police Department (Department) does not satisfy the due process requirements of the federal and state Constitutions and does not comply with the mandates of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act. (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq.)
Factual and Procedural Summary
The conditions under which public safety officers employed by the Department occupy advanced pay grades…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Coscia v. McKenna & CuneoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Haas v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Oberholzer v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sanchez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- James v. City of CoronadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- James v. City of CoronadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- LA POL. PROTECTIVE LEAGUE v. City of LACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.