Legal Opinion

Haas v. County of San Bernardino

California Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 2002No. S076868PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

In this case, we consider a due process challenge to the manner in which some counties select temporary administrative hearing officers. The Government Code authorizes counties to appoint hearing officers to preside when a state law or local ordinance provides that a hearing be held or that findings of fact or conclusions of law be made by any county board, agency, commission or committee. (Gov. Code, § 27721.)1 Exercising this statutory authority, some counties have adopted the practice of selecting temporary administrative hearing officers on an ad hoc basis and paying…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State Ex Rel. Dunlap v. BergerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Imagistics International, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API