State v. Mobley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The offense of resisting arrest, both at common law and under the statute, G.S. 14-223, presupposes a lawful arrest. It is axiomatic that every person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such case the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self-defense. S. v. Beal, 170 N.C. 764, 87 S.E. 416; S. v. Allen, 166 N.C. 265, 80 S.E. 1075; S. v. Belk, 76 N.C. 10; S. v. Bryant, 65 N.C. 327; S. v. Kirby, 24 *479N.C. 201; S. v. Curtis, 2 N.C. 471; 4 Am. Jur., Arrest, Sec. 92; 6 C.J.S., Arrest, See. 13, p. 613. See also 28…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Commonwealth v. GormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Sims v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- State v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. KoonceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Bulova Watch Co. v. Brand Distributors of North Wilkesboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. McCloudSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.