Legal Opinion

State v. Mobley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 9, 1954No. 506PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The offense of resisting arrest, both at common law and under the statute, G.S. 14-223, presupposes a lawful arrest. It is axiomatic that every person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such case the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self-defense. S. v. Beal, 170 N.C. 764, 87 S.E. 416; S. v. Allen, 166 N.C. 265, 80 S.E. 1075; S. v. Belk, 76 N.C. 10; S. v. Bryant, 65 N.C. 327; S. v. Kirby, 24 *479N.C. 201; S. v. Curtis, 2 N.C. 471; 4 Am. Jur., Arrest, Sec. 92; 6 C.J.S., Arrest, See. 13, p. 613. See also 28…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Commonwealth v. GormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Sims v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. State v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. KoonceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. Bulova Watch Co. v. Brand Distributors of North Wilkesboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. McCloudSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API