Legal Opinion
In re Jackson
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 11, 2018No. 17–8006PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULETTE J. DELK
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge. The Panel sua sponte raises the question of whether this appeal was filed late for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 158(c)(2) and finds that it was. Following the Supreme Court's precedent in this area, including its recent decision in Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago ,1 the Panel finds that the time requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 158(c)(2) are jurisdictional in nature and, *413therefore, the Panel is without jurisdiction to hear late appeals, including this one.
FACTS
On September 25, 2013, Melindia Gail Jackson ("Jackson") filed a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilkins v. Menchaca (In Re Wilkins)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Palmour v. Budd (In re Budd)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- PC Puerto Rico, LLC v. Empresas Martinez Valentin CorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Banner Bank v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Duric v. 36 Holdings LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.