Legal Opinion

People v. McMahill

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1906No. Crim. No. 54PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George W. Waldorf, Charles P. Hanlon, Edwin Coolidge and William A. Bowden, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.

The information charged as follows: “The said defendant, on or about the twenty-fifth day of April, A. D. 1905, at the county and state aforesaid, did willfully, unlawfully and fraudulently, and while said defendant was the secretary, agent and servant of the San Jose Chamber of Commerce, an association, appropriate to his own use the sum of $901.67 in lawful money of the United States, the property of said San Jose Chamber of Commerce, which money was on said date in the control and care and had come into the control and care of said defendant solely by virtue of his said employment as such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. TerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. GaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SchroederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Carroll v. Pacific Coast Auto. Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. People v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API