Legal Opinion

People v. Terrill

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1899No. Crim. No. 557PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County sustaining a demurrer to an indictment. William G. Lorigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to an indictment. The grand jury of Santa Clara county, on the ninth day of May, 1899, presented an indictment against the defendant in the following language:

"The said Samuel B. Terrill is accused by the grand jury of the county of Santa Clara, state of California, by this indictment, found this ninth day of May, A. D. 1899, of the crime of forgery, committed as follows: The said Samuel B. Terrill, on the first day of December, A. D. 1896, at the county and state aforesaid, uttered, published, and passed as true and…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. SchmitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. EarlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. People v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. People v. AllisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API