Legal Opinion
Palm v. Mortgage Investment Co. of El Paso
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 25, 1950No. 4696PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGILL, Justice.
The controlling question presented by this appeal is whether certain implied covenants should be incorporated in a written lease of property known as 206 Mills Street in the City of El Paso, by appellee as lessor to appellant as lessee. .On May 2, 1941, by written lease of. that date appellee leased to appellant that certain building known as 206 Mills Street, El Paso, Texas, for a term to commence on June 15, 1941, and to end on September 15, 1947. The lease contained the following provisions:
“2. The rent of said premises shall be a minimum of Fifteen Thousand And No/100…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
- Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Cousins Investment Co. v. Hastings Clothing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Grass v. Big Creek Development Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- Selber Bros. v. Newstadt's Shoe StoresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Stop & Shop, Inc. v. GanemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Percoff v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Weil v. Ann Lewis Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.