Legal Opinion

Selber Bros. v. Newstadt's Shoe Stores

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 12, 1943No. 36788PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

Under a written contract of date May 19, 1937, plaintiff leased to the defendant •partnership the premises known as 425 Milam Street in the City of Shreveport to "be used as a shoe store. This contract of lease, being a renewal or extension of one originally entered into between the parties in 1933, covered a period of one year ■commencing January 1, 1938, and ending December 31, 1938; and it obligated the defendant to pay a stipulated minimum monthly rental of $200 and in addition thereto the amount by which six per cent <of the gross sales in each month would ■exceed the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berger v. QuinteroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  2. Tyler v. WaltSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  3. Selber Bros. v. Newstadt's Shoe StoresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  4. Meyers v. Acme Homestead Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Succession of ButterworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Stop & Shop, Inc. v. GanemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Trinity Universal InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  4. Percoff v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Slater v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API