Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Co. v. North Texas Nat. Bank
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided March 26, 1930No. 1323-5426PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCritz, J.
This suit was instituted in the district court of Dallas county, Tex., by North Texas-National Bank against W. C. Spangler, Royal Indemnity Company of New York, American Sui-ety Company of New York, and the Southwest National Bank, to recover an alleged' shoi*tage of W. C. Spangler in the sum of $38,-571.28, and intei'est. The defendant Spang-ler made no defense. The other defendants-all answered. The pleadings are very voluminous, and we content oui'selves with saying that they are sufficient to present the-issues here involved.
Trial was had in the district court before-the court without the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Consolidated Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1895
- State ex rel. Southern Bank v. AthertonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. American Vitrified Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
- Golden Seal Assurance Society v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by17 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Fenner v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Fort Smith Tobacco & Candy Co. v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
- Ward v. Maryland Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- American Employers' Ins. Co. v. Dallas Joint Stock Land BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.