Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. American Vitrified Products Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1927No. 20388PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The original action herein was upon an indemnity or fidelity bond issued by plaintiff in error to insure the defendant in error from loss by reason of the defalcation of certain of its employes. The American Vitrified Products Company, with its principal office at Akron, Ohio, had a number of factories and branches in various parts of the country. Carl E. Cook was cashier of the factory and sales office at Jackson, Mich., and on March 1, 1924, was so' employed, and had been for many years prior thereto, his employment more than covering the period from December 1, 1922, to June 2, 1924. The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. United States v. Gabriel F. IrvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  3. T. M. Sinclair & Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Supreme Council Catholic Knights v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fenner v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. American Surety Co. of New York v. North Texas Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. North Texas Nat. BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Smith v. Federal Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  5. White Dairy Co. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API