Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Consolidated Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
£u Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern-District; of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
The demand of the plaintiff below was founded upon a bond as follows:
'-No. «,074. $14,000.
‘This Bond, made the* thirtieth day of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty-nine, between the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, hereinafter called the ‘company,’ of the first, pari, and Theo. F. Baker, of Philadelphia, Pa., hereinafter called the ''employed,’ of the second part, and Consolidation National Bank, hereinnfior called the ‘employer,’ of the third part. Whereas, the employed has been appointed paying teller in the service of…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Ballard County Bank's Assignee v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. Dallas Steam Laundry & Dye WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Green v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- American Surety Co. of New York v. North Texas Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. North Texas Nat. BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.