Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1941No. 9476PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, District Judge.

This is an appeal by the surety company from an adverse judgment on its bond given to protect the bank against dishonesty of its employees. The principal complaint of the appellant is that the evidence was such that the jury’s verdict was and could have been based only upon speculation, and but for certain alleged erroneous rulings upon evidence and instructions to the jury by the' lower court, no definite loss could have been established under the bond.

The plaintiff was the successor to a previous bank of the same name, except that, as was done in numerous instances…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schmieder v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. North Texas Nat. BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. First Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Estate of Jordan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United Pacific Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Brown v. BuchananDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1975
  4. General Finance Corporation, Bankrupt, by Ronald W. Wright, Trustee v. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. MichenerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API