Continental Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAWKINS, District Judge.
This is an appeal by the surety company from an adverse judgment on its bond given to protect the bank against dishonesty of its employees. The principal complaint of the appellant is that the evidence was such that the jury’s verdict was and could have been based only upon speculation, and but for certain alleged erroneous rulings upon evidence and instructions to the jury by the' lower court, no definite loss could have been established under the bond.
The plaintiff was the successor to a previous bank of the same name, except that, as was done in numerous instances…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schmieder v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. North Texas Nat. BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. First Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
3Cited by33 opinions
- Estate of Jordan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United Pacific Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Brown v. BuchananDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1975
- General Finance Corporation, Bankrupt, by Ronald W. Wright, Trustee v. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. MichenerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.