Legal Opinion
Warren E. Davis and Donald W. Granger v. Stanley B. Loesch, James C. St. John, and Danny K. Mints
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 9, 1993No. 92-1231PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 141 (1988), from a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in an interference. The interference was between, on the one hand, the continuation application of joint inventors Stanley B. Loesch, James C. St. John, and Danny K. Mints (sometimes collectively, “Loesch”) 1 and, on the other hand, United States Patent No. 4,420,942 (the ’942 patent), issued to joint inventors Warren E. Davis and Donald W. Granger (sometimes collectively, “Davis”), and the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Jack E. Caveney and Roy A. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Peter J. Degeorge v. Donald R. BernierCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- David M. Rapoport v. William C. Dement, Mark R. Rosekind, and Jeffrey L. SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- John H. Griffin and Judith Greengard v. Rogier M. Bertina and Pieter H. ReitsmaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- William S. Credle, Jr. And Debra Boone Overman v. Curtis J. BondCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Johns Hopkins University v. 454 Life Sciences Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- National Research & Development Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995