Kataoka v. Hanselman
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The justices of the district court of appeal of the second appellate district, to which this cause had been appealed, not being able to unanimously agree in a judgment, filed their opinions, and the cause was transferred to this court. In the district court a majority of the justices concurred in the following opinion: —
"The suit was brought on a contract between the defendant and plaintiff set out in the complaintby the terms of which the plaintiff agreed, in effect, to cultivate certain lands of the defendant planted to beets and load the beets into wagon as instructed by the latter or his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Patterson v. San Francisco & San Mateo Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Virtue v. FlyntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Mallett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Kellett v. KellettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.