Legal Opinion

United States v. Christopher

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1934No. 997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an equitable action to cancel a patent issued under the homestead laws of the United States conveying to Frank Christopher 325.02 acres of nonmineral, nonirrigable land situated in Fremont county, Colo. On June 7, 1932, the court dismissed the bill of complaint because it waS-filed more than six years after the patent issued. The order expressly granted permission to file an amended bill within thirty days from that date. On August 9, 1933, about fourteen months thereafter, during a subsequent term of the court, an amended bill was tendered in which it was…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. Felix v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Kirby v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shonts v. HirlimanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
  2. United States v. Eaton Shale Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1977
  3. Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1941
  4. Izaak Walton League of America v. St. ClairDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
  5. May v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API