Legal Opinion
May v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 15, 1935No. 3617PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This bill of complaint is brought to enjoin the use by defendant of registered trade-marks which, according to the allegations of the bill, infringe rights of the plaintiffs.
Statement of Facts,
The facts readily fall into several groups. I will first state those relating to the defendant’s trade-marks and their use.
1. The defendant, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, was incorporated under the laws of Ohio in 1898 with a usual place of business in Akron, Ohio. Its business is the manufacture and sale of rubber goods including rubber tiles, rubber tires, rubber heels, and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of PatentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Merry Hull & Company v. Hi-Line Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Mercado-Salinas v. Bart Enterprises International, Ltd.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
- In Re Specialty Foods of Pittsburgh, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Mercado-Salinas v. Bart Enterprises International, Ltd.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010