Legal Opinion

Shonts v. Hirliman

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 17, 1939No. 8358-Y, 8301-Y, 21-YPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYankwich, District Judge

(after stating facts as above).

The problems presented by these motions must be solved by an analysis of the statute or by reference to similar statutes or claims of similar character, because, owing to the newness of the Securities Act of 1933, there are no cases determining them.

The Congress of the United States, for the first time in its history, undertook in 1933, to pass a statute similar to the state Corporate Securities statutes, commonly known as “blue sky laws”. They take their name from their object, which is to prevent promoters of corporate securities from selling “the blue sky” to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Feit v. Leasco Data Processing Equipment CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
  5. Cook v. Deltona Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API