Legal Opinion
Izaak Walton League of America v. St. Clair
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 16, 1972No. 5-69 Civ. 70PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
Presented to the court by the defendant Herbst, successor to defendant Leirfallom as Commissioner of Natural Resources for the State of Minnesota1 is a motion for leave to amend to his cross-claim, filed some five months earlier. The court is aware that under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure such an amendment should be “freely given when justice so requires”. If, however, assuming the truth, validity and ability to prove the allegations set forth in the amended pleading, the same still would not constitute a claim upon which relief can be granted, then…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Exploration Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- United States v. Whited & Wheless, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McComasSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Ass'n of Property Owners v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
- Izaak Walton League of America v. George W. St. Clair, Izaak Walton League of America v. Robert L. Herbst, Commissioner of Conservation of the State of Minnesota, Earl L. Butz v. Izaak Walton League of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Milburn v. GirardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Izaak Walton League of America v. St. ClairDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
- Izaak Walton League v. St. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974