Fireman's Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentNess, Chief Justice
I dissent and would affirm the opinion of the trial court.
I
Mutual Exclusivity of Underinsured and Uninsured Motorist Coverage
Neither the Majority Opinion nor the Appellant cites any contractual or statutory provision which specifically provides that underinsured and uninsured motorist coverage are mutually exclusive. On the contrary, this conclusion is reached by the Majority by interpreting the definition of underinsured motorist coverage as found in the statute on the date of this incident.1 The Majority reasons that in the majority of cases, an at fault driver will not satisfy both the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Garris v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Busby v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Jackson Ex Rel. Estate of Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Kraft v. Hartford Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.