Quintanilla v. Dunkelman
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs Isabel and Ramon A. Quintanilla 1 filed a second amended complaint against defendants Clinica Medica General, 2 Los Angeles Surgical Center, 3 Cedars Towers Surgical Medical Group (Cedars Towers), Ricardo Navas, M.D., and Daniel S. Dunkelman, M.D., alleging causes of action against defendants for negligent medical care including lack of informed consent, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The second amended complaint further alleged that Ramon sustained a loss of consortium. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Cedars…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Scott v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Arato v. AvedonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- San Diego Health & Human Services Agency v. Amanda B.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Wilson v. MerrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Melvin Kornberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Davis v. Physician Assistant BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Flores v. LiuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.