Legal Opinion

Phifer v. Burton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1926No. 20171. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In an action for damages against appellant and five others for the alleged negligent sinking of a house-boat on Lake Union, personal service was made on appellant on July 23,. 1923. Some of the other defendants were served, and all defaulted.

On February 4,1925, respondent procured an order of default, and caused the same to be entered in the lower court. On the same day, findings of fact were signed and entered, which, among other things, recited

• “ . . . that the cause was presented to the court upon the pleadings, the exhibit, and the evidence, and the court in all respects being fully…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Locomotive Exchange, Inc. v. Rucker Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Rood v. HortonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Powelson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. McConnell v. Gordon Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hansen v. RothausWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kiessling v. Northwest Greyhound Lines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. STATE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Department of Corrections v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API