Department of Corrections v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 The parties before us agreed to resolve their underlying dispute in binding arbitration. Fluor Daniel, Inc., prevailed and moved to reduce the arbitration award to judgment. Concluding that the arbitration award liquidated previously nonliquidated damages, the trial court reduced that award to judgment and added prejudgment interest from the date the arbitrator rendered the award to the time it was entered into judgment. We conclude that an arbitration award does not transform an unliquidated claim into a fully liquidated sum entitling the prevailing party to prejudgment interest.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Elcon Construction, Inc. v. Eastern Washington UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Saleemi v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- Yakima County v. LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Yakima County v. Yakima County Law Enforcement Officers GuildCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Peters v. Amazon Services LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.