Legal Opinion
State v. Rogers
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 2007No. 33935PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
Paul L. Rogers appeals his termination from the Ada County Drug Court Program and his subsequent sentencing for possession of a controlled substance. Rogers alleges that he was terminated from the drug court program without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. We vacate Roger’s conviction and remand for further proceedings.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On February 24, 2003, Rogers was charged with possession of methamphetamine and driving without privileges. Rogers reached a plea agreement with the State, wherein the State agreed to drop the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hagar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Krystal Lynn EasleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Thompson Creek Mining Co. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BelyeaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. LaPlacaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.