Legal Opinion
Thompson Creek Mining Co. v. Idaho Department of Water Resources
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 2009No. 35175PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
This case arises out of the creation of Water District No. 170 (WD170) by the director (Director) of the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR). Thompson Creek Mining Company (Thompson Creek) alleges that the Director violated procedural due process under both the Idaho and United States Constitutions in creating WD170 without following proper hearing guidelines as established under the Idaho Administrative Procedure Act (IDAPA). Thompson Creek further alleges that the Director exceeded his mandate in creating WD170 without substantial evidence that the district was…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Losser v. BradstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Stivers v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Friends of Minidoka v. Jerome CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Keating v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Rangen, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Noble v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- South Valley Ground Water v. ID Dept of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.