State v. Krystal Lynn Easley
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, J., pro tem.
I
Nature of the Case
This is an appeal from the district court’s order revoking Krystal Easley’s probation and this Court’s partial denial of her request to augment the record with various transcripts to be created at the public’s expense. The case also presents the issue of the prosecutor’s refusal to consent to the district judge’s desire to sentence Easley to mental health court and the district court’s acquiescence in that refusal.
II
Factual and Procedural Background
In September of 2005, Krystal Easley was charged by Information with possession of a controlled…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. Mark LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Jason Zane GarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. OsbornIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. AhmedIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.