State ex rel. Verhovec v. Mascio
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 81 Ohio St.3d 334.] THE STATE EX REL. VERHOVEC ET AL. v. MASCIO, JUDGE. [Cite as State ex rel. Verhovec v. Mascio,
1998-Ohio-431.] Writ of procedendo to compel common pleas judge to reactivate a civil case that was stayed pending resolution of defendant’s criminal appeal and to schedule the case for trial on the merits as soon as reasonably possible— Writ granted, when. (No. 97-2446—Submitted January 20, 1998—Decided April 1, 1998.) IN PROCEDENDO. __________________ {¶ 1} According to relators, Joseph, Phyllis, Edward, and Dorothy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Miley v. ParrottOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Askew v. GoldhartOhio Supreme Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McWilliams v. SchumacherOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Lahoud v. Tri-Monex, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Estate of Lewis v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2026