Legal Opinion

Lahoud v. Tri-Monex, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 2011No. 96118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Lahoud v. Tri-Monex, Inc.,

2011-Ohio-4120.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96118 JIHAD LAHOUD, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES vs. TRI-MONEX, INC., ET AL. DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED Civil Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CV-702167 BEFORE: Rocco, J., Stewart, P.J., and Celebrezze, J. RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: August 18, 2011 2 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS Aleksandar Rakic 1787 Pearl Road Brunswick, Ohio 44212 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES Michael J. Downing 75 Public Square, Suite 920…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Contempt of WallaceOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. In re Contempt of HardenOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Pannell v. McCallOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. Ward v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API