Legal Opinion
Koontz v. Astronics Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frank R. Bayger, J.
The principal issue presented in this case is whether a licensed real estate salesman may recover a finder’s fee or sale commission allegedly due under an oral agreement to compensate him for services rendered as a business broker. Suit was brought by the plaintiff, Koontz, a licensed real estate salesman, and his business brokerage, E. R. Koontz & Associates (Associates), a partnership comprised of Mr. Koontz and his wife, to recover commissions allegedly due as a result of the defendant Astronics Corporation’s (Astronics) purchase of the codefendant,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Bradkin v. LevertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Morris Cohon & Co. v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Minichiello v. Royal Business Funds Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Small v. MarcheseAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Norton J. Lehman v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Reiss v. Gan S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999