Legal Opinion
Reiss v. Gan S.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 29, 1999No. 98 Civ. 8302(SAS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
This is an action to recover a finder’s fee to which plaintiff Brad M. Reiss (“Reiss”) claims he is entitled for having successfully interested General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”) in acquiring two French real estate companies, Union Pour le Fi-nancement D’Immeubles de Sociétés (“UIS”) and Union Industrielle de Credit (“UIC”). Reiss claims that he entered into an oral contract with Alain Juliard (“Juliard”), the Chairperson of UIS, to find a buyer for UIS and UIC in exchange for a commission of 1% of the value of the transaction. The…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brad M. Reiss v. Societe Centrale Du Groupe Des Assurances NationalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Crystalline H2O, Inc. v. OrminskiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Reiss v. Société Centrale Du Groupe Des Assurances NationalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Reiss v. Societe Centrale du Groupe des Assurances NationalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Reiss v. Societe Centrale Du Groupe Des Assurances NationalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.