Legal Opinion

State v. DiChristofaro

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 10, 2004No. 2002-193-C.APublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The defendant, Anthony J. DiChristofa-ro (defendant), appeals from a Superior Court judgment revoking his probation. This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on February 3, 2004, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown, and proceed to decide the appeal at this time. We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

I

Facts and Travel

On June…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolmgrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. State v. RiouxSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  3. State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  4. Hampton v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  5. State v. PaganSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TetreaultSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  2. State v. John FordSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  3. State v. DiChristofaroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API