Legal Opinion

State v. Tetreault

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 17, 2009No. 2006-290-CAPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Acting Chief Justice GOLDBERG,

for the Court.

This ease came before the Supreme Court on April 8, 2009, on an appeal by the defendant, Michael Tetreault (defendant), from a Superior Court judgment declaring him a violator of the terms and conditions of a previously imposed probationary term. A single justice of this Court issued an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the parties’ memoranda, we are satisfied that cause has not been shown, and we shall…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolmgrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. State v. BouffardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  4. State v. ChristodalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. State v. PenaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. JensenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  2. State v. John FordSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  3. State v. LancellottaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  4. State v. GilbertSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  5. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API