Legal Opinion

Hampton v. State

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 24, 2001No. 99-385-C.APublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLANDERS, Justice.

Was a probation violator entitled to notice from either the court or his attorney about his right to appeal the violation finding? If so, was the violator entitled to post-conviction relief (PCR) based upon the failure to provide him with such notice? Even assuming that the violator's attorney should have notified him about his right to appeal from the order revoking his probation, the violator, we hold, was not entitled to post-conviction relief because he suffered no prejudice from this lack of notice.

This is the probation violator’s appeal from the Superior Court’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Brennan v. VoseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. State v. ChabotSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  2. State v. GautierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  3. Ferrell v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  4. Burke v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  5. State v. VasheySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API