Anastassatos v. Anastassatos
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this appeal from a judgment modifying child support, appellant contends that the district court: (1) exceeded its jurisdiction by entering an order regarding matters not properly before the court; (2) improperly abated child support; and (3) improperly set the date for commencement of increased child support payments. We conclude that the district court did exceed its jurisdiction, and that it improperly abated child support. However, the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining the date upon which increased child support would commence. Accordingly, we affirm in…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Schwartz v. SchwartzNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Barbagallo v. BarbagalloNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Lewis v. HicksNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Westgate v. WestgateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
4Cited by10 opinions
- Wallace v. WallaceNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Love v. LoveNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Fernandez v. FernandezNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Kirkpatrick v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Kirkpatrick v. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.