Fernandez v. Fernandez
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Pickering, J.:
This is an appeal by the father of minor children from an order denying a motion to modify child support under NRS 125B.145. The trial court held that it was “not bound” by NRS 125B.145 because the parties “previously agreed in a stipulation and order modifying the Decree of Divorce that neither party [would] seek modification of child support.” In the trial court’s view, this made the child support order nonmodifiable, so long as the father had “sufficient means (assets and/or income) to meet the agreed upon child support obligations.”
The motion to modify…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Rivero v. RiveroNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Lang v. LangDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Day v. DayNevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Willerton v. BasshamNevada Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Haley v. DIST. CT.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Haley v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Nevada Commission on Ethics v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- MARTINEZ v. MARTINEZ (CHILD CUSTODY)Nevada Supreme Court · 2024
- DELUCCHI VS. SONGERNevada Supreme Court · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.