Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Hicks

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1992No. 22835PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In an action by Dena Lewis to increase Phillip Hicks’ child support obligation, the trial court affirmed a recommendation of the domestic referee setting support at less than half of the statutorily prescribed amount. For the reasons set forth below, we find that the trial court erred.

In 1984, Dena Lewis and Phillip Hicks had a child, Tiffanie Hicks, out of wedlock. Both parents subsequently married others. In 1986, Lewis and Hicks stipulated to paternity and joint legal custody of Tiffanie. The parties further agreed that Lewis would take physical custody when Tiffanie entered…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barbagallo v. BarbagalloNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Atkins v. AtkinsNevada Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Scott v. ScottNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hoover v. HooverNevada Supreme Court · 1990

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Love v. LoveNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Fernandez v. FernandezNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Anastassatos v. AnastassatosNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Rodgers v. RodgersNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Jackson v. JacksonNevada Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API